Sample Robot #1-B



-
Summary:
-
Modified from Sample Robot #1 design.
-
same: Large drive wheels on center axis, under RCX body.
-
same: Motors behind RCX body drive each wheel via a medium gear
pressed against the tire!
-
changed: Rearidler wheel (without tire) on center line. [front
wheel removed]
-
changed: Front facing ball arm, with a flipping motion, directly
connected to a motor axle.
-
Light sensor at rear, facing down.
-
Rotation sensor connected to the right wheel axle (turned via a small drive
belt).
-
Touch sensor at front, facing forward, with a wide push bar attached.
-
Good features:
-
Good traction on smooth or carpet surfaces.
-
Medium fast motion.
-
Works forward and backwards.
-
Excellent turning ability (can turn in place).
-
Wheel drive is simple and reliable on flat surfaces
(direct "rim" drive).
-
Ball arm is simple and reliable (direct drive, no
gears or belts).
-
Light sensor can detect black floor line, to determine
when to turn left (or for other uses).
-
Rotation sensor can record distances for navigation
/ backtracking.
-
Touch sensor can detect when container is reached,
to activate the ball arm.
-
Small compact design.
-
The redesigned ball arm can deposit the ball a few
inches or more from the robot, adjustable via motor power.
-
It is almost always successful at dropping a ball
in a properly positioned container (mission 2).
-
Not so good features:
-
Sometimes this robot does not go very straight.
It originally tended to pull to the left, especially going backwards.
-
By adjusting the wheels, which apparently were rubbing,
this problem was greatly reduced.
-
Forward facing ball arm requires the robot to turn
for mission 2.
-
Could be redesigned to face the side.
-
Using sensors makes the programming more complex
(but more reliable).
-
Distance travelled might depend on battery condition,
surface, etc.
-
Moderate to poor climbing ability, caused by drive
gear slippage.
-
Sometimes the turns (controlled by timing) are slightly
more or less than 90 degrees, causing the robot to go off course.
-
Note: using the rotation sensor for controlling turns
seems even less accurate, due to the small number of rotations.
-
Some parts of the robot are not strongly attached.
Parts may fall off if bumped hard.
November 18, 1999